8000 addition of min_impurity_split is not in changelog · Issue #8401 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

addition of min_impurity_split is not in changelog #8401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
amueller opened this issue Feb 19, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

addition of min_impurity_split is not in changelog #8401

amueller opened this issue Feb 19, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
Documentation Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Sprint

Comments

@amueller
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@amueller amueller added Documentation Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Need Contributor labels Feb 19, 2017
@aashil
Copy link
Contributor
aashil commented Feb 19, 2017

I will take this one.

@aashil
Copy link
Contributor
aashil commented Feb 19, 2017

You mean add Added weighted impurity-based early stopping criterion for decision tree growth. #6954 by Nelson Liu in the version 0.19 changelog?

@jnothman
Copy link
Member
jnothman commented Feb 19, 2017 via email

@amueller
Copy link
Member Author
amueller commented Mar 3, 2017

@aashil did you post a PR for this? is so, please post the issue number here.

@aashil
Copy link
Contributor
aashil commented Mar 4, 2017

@amueller I think it's already there in 0.18 changelogs as confirmed by @jnothman? Let me know if I am wrong.

@nelson-liu
Copy link
Contributor

agreed, looks like it is there

@jnothman jnothman closed this as completed Mar 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Documentation Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Sprint
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jnothman @amueller @aashil @nelson-liu
0