8000 MAINT: Remove custom fused type in skimage/morphology/_max_tree.pyx by sciunto · Pull Request #4931 · scikit-image/scikit-image · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

MAINT: Remove custom fused type in skimage/morphology/_max_tree.pyx #4931

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2020
Merged

MAINT: Remove custom fused type in skimage/morphology/_max_tree.pyx #4931

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2020

Conversation

sciunto
Copy link
Member
@sciunto sciunto commented Aug 21, 2020

Description

Removes an item in the TODO list.

Checklist

For reviewers

  • Check that the PR title is short, concise, and will make sense 1 year
    later.
  • Check that new functions are imported in corresponding __init__.py.
  • Check that new features, API changes, and deprecations are mentioned in
    doc/release/release_dev.rst.

@sciunto sciunto requested a review from jni August 21, 2020 06:56
@sciunto sciunto added the 🔧 type: Maintenance Refactoring and maintenance of internals label Aug 21, 2020
@sciunto sciunto added this to the 0.18 milestone Aug 21, 2020
@jni jni merged commit 762ff1a into scikit-image:master Aug 23, 2020
@sciunto sciunto deleted the fused_types branch August 23, 2020 09:51
@alexdesiqueira alexdesiqueira mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hmaarrfk hmaarrfk hmaarrfk approved these changes

@jni jni jni approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🔧 type: Maintenance Refactoring and maintenance of internals
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.18
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@sciunto @hmaarrfk @jni
0