Add "subjectOf" as a reverse for "about" #1670
Comments
I hear ya (really) and I'm not saying we shouldn't introduce subjectOf but the difficulty I have with the above statement is that IMHO it's an excuse many use for not making the effort of explaining how @reverse works. Most I introduce it to are confused at first due to being completely unaware of the existence of a reverse mechanism, though I haven't encountered anybody who wasn't able to grasp it - after some explanation. Maybe a bit more guidance and education could do the trick already (through some schema.org notes, or even by having the sponsors state something about it in their webmaster guidelines). |
|
we should do both, imho. |
|
If |
Issue #1670: Added subjectOf as a named inverse of schema.org/about.
|
Added to pending. |
|
Am I correct to notice that there subjectOf is a superset of http://schema.org/WriteAction? I am just noticing that there appears to be nohttp://schema.org/SpeakAction or http://schema.org/RecordAction for the audio modality corollary to the written modality described in http://schema.org/WriteAction. I'm not sure where to make that remark. |
|
I personally think the domain should be Http:/19/GIG-thing.org |
|
please and thank you :) if possible or at least let me contribute since I have very personal intimate connection to the Iot device. |
|
@thadguidry there is a, probably too subtle, visual clue. Its colour is red, although other terms defined in extensions are blue. about appears in the pending listings, because part of its definition (inverseOf subjectOf) is declared in pending. |
|
Feedback: we've been using this at Google in various feeds-oriented settings and it seems to make markup more natural and idiomatic. I suggest we add it to core rather than continue the "about" (core), "subjectOf" (not core) split... |
|
I agree. the core vs non-core split is confusing at best.
guha
…On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:41 PM Dan Brickley ***@***.***> wrote:
Feedback: we've been using this at Google in various feeds-oriented
settings and it seems to make markup more natural and idiomatic. I suggest
we add it to core rather than continue the "about" (core), "subjectOf" (not
core) split...
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1670 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAlCn1sg9q2ZwYw7YJwoKAC9ci2ktp_ks5vKQuLgaJpZM4N-mBT>
.
|
|
Am I correct to notice that there subjectOf is a superset of http://schema.org/WriteAction? I am just noticing that there appears to be nohttp://schema.org/SpeakAction or http://schema.org/RecordAction for the audio modality corollary to the written modality described in http://schema.org/WriteAction. I'm not sure where to make that remark. |
|
similar of the newly described noticed inside of the contextual information
provided in this thread.
Notice:
To reorganize the Department of Defense and strengthen civilian authority
in the Department of Defense, to improve the military advice provided to
the President, the National Security Council, and the Secretary of Defense,
to place clear responsibility on the commanders of the unified and
specified combatant commands for the accomplishment of missions assigned to
those commands and ensure that the authority of those commanders is fully
commensurate with that responsibility, to increase attention to the
formulation of strategy and to contingency planning, to provide for more
efficient use of defense resources, to improve joint officer management
policies, otherwise to enhance the effectiveness of military operations and
improve the management and administration of the Department of Defense, and
for other purposes.
Marking the responsibility "_type" of scope providing consultable
notifications.
Respectfully,
Christopher M. Spradling
…On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:58 PM Os10melhores ***@***.***> wrote:
Am I correct to notice that there subjectOf is a superset of
http://schema.org/WriteAction? I am just noticing that there appears to
be nohttp://schema.org/SpeakAction or http://schema.org/RecordAction for
the audio modality corollary to the written modality described in
http://schema.org/WriteAction. I'm not sure where to make that remark.
http://os10melhores.net/
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1670 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFVNURKCN5G5NVT2IED32LSVAV7BANCNFSM4DP2MBJQ>
.
|
|
More information would conclude within the Goldwater-Nichols Act: Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater%E2%80%93Nichols_Act>
Respectfully,
Christopher
…On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:58 PM Os10melhores ***@***.***> wrote:
Am I correct to notice that there subjectOf is a superset of
http://schema.org/WriteAction? I am just noticing that there appears to
be nohttp://schema.org/SpeakAction or http://schema.org/RecordAction for
the audio modality corollary to the written modality described in
http://schema.org/WriteAction. I'm not sure where to make that remark.
http://os10melhores.net/
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1670 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFVNURKCN5G5NVT2IED32LSVAV7BANCNFSM4DP2MBJQ>
.
|
|
Please take notice to the "nohttp" indicator which points to the server
side and excludes the front client side ineffective.
Inside gmail editor, the #to the is for some reason indicating inside
reply. This is not normal punctuation creation and I'm not a Latin editor
philosopher either lol.
Good luck everyone,
Chris "by the Way" Spradling
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:57 PM Chris Spradling <
chrisspradling1980@gmail.com> wrote:
… More information would conclude within the Goldwater-Nichols Act:
Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater%E2%80%93Nichols_Act>
Respectfully,
Christopher
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:58 PM Os10melhores ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Am I correct to notice that there subjectOf is a superset of
> http://schema.org/WriteAction? I am just noticing that there appears to
> be nohttp://schema.org/SpeakAction or http://schema.org/RecordAction for
> the audio modality corollary to the written modality described in
> http://schema.org/WriteAction. I'm not sure where to make that remark.
>
> http://os10melhores.net/
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1670 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFVNURKCN5G5NVT2IED32LSVAV7BANCNFSM4DP2MBJQ>
> .
>
|
|
Nós fazemos o trabalho duro e filtramos entre as diversas opções, os melhores produtos e serviços do mercado, para você. |
tl;dr: I propose adding http://schema.org/subjectOf as a named reverse property of http://schema.org/about. The domain would be http://schema.org/Thing and the range would be http://schema.org/CreativeWork and http://schema.org/Event.
There are lots of cases where the main subject of given page is a Person, Organization, etc and authors want to mention there is a work about that entity. It would be nice to have a "subjectOf" property to link to the work. (In JSON-LD, you can use @reverse, but there is no reverse mechanism in microdata yet.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: