8000 overhaul of mailing lists section by SethTisue · Pull Request #329 · scala/scala-lang · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member
  • put them in a better order
  • revised wording for list descriptions, including incorporating the
    best bits of the mailing list descriptions that were removed from
    the Code of Conduct page by
    minor tweaks to code of conduct page docs.scala-lang#455
  • add the no-job-listings blurb from the CoC page, removed
    by the same PR
  • don't list scala-xml anymore, it's pretty dead
  • move the Gmane links to the end, for a less cluttered look

review by @heathermiller, @dickwall, @jsuereth

- put them in a better order
- revised wording for list descriptions, including incorporating the
  best bits of the mailing list descriptions that were removed from
  the Code of Conduct page by
  scala/docs.scala-lang#455
- add the no-job-listings blurb from the CoC page, removed
  by the same PR
- don't list scala-xml anymore, it's pretty dead
- move the Gmane links to the end, for a less cluttered look
@heathermiller
Copy link
Member

Great! LGTM!
One small question though, did you try generating it? If I recall correctly, sometimes linebreaks between bullet points end up being translated to new <p> blocks, which can look a bit odd. Up to you though, just asking.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

I double-checked just now and it seems fine.

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member

LGTM then! @dickwall and/or @jsuereth, if you guys have anything you'd like to add or change, please comment here or make a separate PR.

Thanks Seth!

heathermiller added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2015
@heathermiller heathermiller merged commit fde6d73 into scala:master Sep 14, 2015
@SethTisue SethTisue deleted the mailing-list-revisions branch September 14, 2015 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0