8000 Fix how "sbt" is written by dwijnand · Pull Request #5610 · scala/scala · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Fix how "sbt" is written #5610

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2016
Merged

Fix how "sbt" is written #5610

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2016

Conversation

dwijnand
Copy link
Member

"sbt" is not an acronym (it used to be, but it isn't any longer).
It's a proper name, like "iPhone" or "eBay".

So, just like you wouldn't write "Get Started With EBay" or
"How To Reset Your IPhone", we don't write "Using the Sbt Build".

@dwijnand
Fix how "sbt" is written
f678a57 
"sbt" is not an acronym (it used to be, but it isn't any longer).
It's a proper name, like "iPhone" or "eBay".

So, just like you wouldn't write "Get Started With EBay" or
"How To Reset Your IPhone", we don't write "Using the Sbt Build".
@scala-jenkins scala-jenkins added this to the 2.12.2 milestone Dec 21, 2016
@smarter
Copy link
Member
smarter commented Dec 21, 2016

"sbt" is not an acronym

I thought everyone knew that sbt stands for "sbt build tool" :)

@lrytz
Copy link
Member
lrytz commented Dec 21, 2016

/nothingtoseehere (no code changes)

@lrytz lrytz merged commit a3135bf into scala:2.12.x Dec 21, 2016
@dwijnand
Copy link
Member Author

That was fast :) Thanks Lukas.

@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the sbt branch December 21, 2016 13:26
@lrytz
Copy link
Member
lrytz commented Dec 21, 2016

Thanks to you :)

Philippus added a commit to Philippus/scala.github.com that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2017
@Philippus
SBT is no longer an acronym, see also scala/scala#5610
c9c978d
@SethTisue SethTisue mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lrytz lrytz lrytz approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.12.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@dwijnand @smarter @lrytz @scala-jenkins
0