8000 Minutes for May 2017, draft 0 by darjutak · Pull Request #868 · scala/docs.scala-lang · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Minutes for May 2017, draft 0 #868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 16, 2017
Merged

Minutes for May 2017, draft 0 #868

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a2ee1a8
Trying the new minutes april 2017
darjutak Aug 16, 2017
79a915c
Changed the title
darjutak Aug 16, 2017
2784d99
Delete 2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md
darjutak Aug 16, 2017
7dcbb9a
2017_05_08_Minutes
darjutak Aug 16, 2017
e56c394
May minutes draft 0
darjutak Aug 17, 2017
4127fd7
Merge branch 'darjutak-patch-1' of https://github.com/darjutak/docs.s…
darjutak Aug 17, 2017
b726ea1
SIP-NN comondic-comprehensions marked as rejected
darjutak Aug 17, 2017
de4bffd
Update 2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md
darjutak Oct 2, 2017
59babc7
Update 2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md
darjutak Oct 6, 2017
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Update 2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md
  • Loading branch information
@darjutak
darjutak authored Oct 6, 2017
commit 59babc7b4bc82231291023419953b4b445f5bb83
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _sips/minutes/2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Refers to the paper “Denotation” he linked in a proposal, that is not enough

**Jorge** is getting back discussion on voting on this proposal and he mentioned that Josh insisted on more examples and suggestions on motivation of this SIP.

**Eugene** wanted to add more syntax (map and flatmap), but Martin opposed to that saying that Scala is quite serious program and needs more reason to add any additional syntax to it. **Martin** would like to see more widespread use of common attic constructs and Libraries, and before doing that, he wouldn’t consider any further change. **Sebastian** agrees with Martin and says that he doesn’t really understand Josh’s and Eugene’s proposal. **Iulian** agrees that the proposal is quite complicated and he wonders how it can be useful. He believes that it is an interesting research direction, but that it needs more users feedbacks in aim to be included in the Scala, therefore questioning if the proposal should be numbered in the current form. Seth and Adriaan agree with Martin and Iulian.
**Eugene** wanted to add more syntax (map and flatmap), but **Martin** opposed to that saying that Scala is quite serious program and needs more reason to add any additional syntax to it. **Martin** would like to see more widespread use of comonadic constructs and Libraries, and before doing that, he wouldn’t consider any further change. **Sebastian** agrees with Martin and says that he doesn’t really understand Josh’s and Eugene’s proposal. **Iulian** agrees that the proposal is quite complicated and he wonders how it can be useful. He believes that it is an interesting research direction, but that it needs more users feedbacks in aim to be included in the Scala, therefore questioning if the proposal should be numbered in the current form. Seth and Adriaan agree with Martin and Iulian.

**Conclusion** Proposal discarded unanimously. They will send the feedback to the author.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Who was supposed to send feedback? Was feedback indeed sent?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here. Can someone please have a look to see if feedback was indeed sent?


Expand Down
0