10000 Update derive_more requirement from 0.99 to 2.0 by cc90202 · Pull Request #289 · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-stream-rust-client · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Update derive_more requirement from 0.99 to 2.0 #289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update derive_more requirement from 0.99 to 2.0 #289

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

cc90202
Copy link
@cc90202 cc90202 commented May 23, 2025

The update requires small changes in toml file and a quick fix in value.rs

@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented May 29, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.07%. Comparing base (2ae3c19) to head (4af0ab8).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/producer.rs 83.92% 9 Missing ⚠️
...rotocol/src/message/amqp/types/primitives/value.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #289      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.88%   89.07%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines        7541     7532       -9     
==========================================
+ Hits         6703     6709       +6     
+ Misses        838      823      -15

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@cc90202 @allevo
0