8000 try relanding cublaslt autotuning support for TunableOp # by bilal2vec · Pull Request #153316 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

try relanding cublaslt autotuning support for TunableOp # #153316

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bilal2vec
Copy link
Contributor
@bilal2vec bilal2vec commented May 10, 2025

Try relanding #133896

Adds support for cublaslt autotuning to TunableOp.

Todo:

  • Add and test ScaledGemmTunableOp
  • Benchmarking numbers

Copy link
pytorch-bot bot commented May 10, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/153316

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 945b27e with merge base b5f1345 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR label May 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR open source
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0