8000 [FlexAttention] Remove old constraint that was causing assert failure by drisspg · Pull Request #151521 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[FlexAttention] Remove old constraint that was causing assert failure #151521

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

drisspg
Copy link
Contributor
@drisspg drisspg commented Apr 17, 2025

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 17, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/151521

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 33 Pending

As of commit b70a871 with merge base 2c27597 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
@drisspg drisspg requested review from Chillee and BoyuanFeng April 17, 2025 04:06
@drisspg drisspg added this to the 2.7.1 milestone Apr 17, 2025
@drisspg drisspg requested a review from mandroid6 April 17, 2025 13:20
@drisspg
Copy link
Contributor Author
drisspg commented Apr 17, 2025

@mandroid6 just a heads up I imagine there is some overlap between this and the TMA work

drisspg added 3 commits April 21, 2025 16:17
…ert failure"



# Summary
Fixes: #148827

This one is strange, I could have sworn this was a real constraint, but I verified and did some performance checks and this constraint isn't required. 

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 amjames chauhang aakhundov Chillee yanboliang BoyuanFeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
drisspg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
@drisspg drisspg closed this Apr 22, 2025
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor
atalman commented May 7, 2025

@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/2.7 -c critical

1 similar comment
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor
atalman commented May 7, 2025

@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/2.7 -c critical

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0