[export] Remove torch._export.export #119095
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/119095
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 3369881 with merge base 4f2bf7f ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D53316196 |
|
Was the old one widely used? |
777aeb5 to
bf8c737
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #119095 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: ydwu4 Differential Revision: D53316196
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D53316196 |
bf8c737 to
0917c5f
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#119095 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: tugsbayasgalan, ydwu4 Differential Revision: D53316196
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D53316196 |
| return out_dtype( | ||
| torch.ops.aten.add_.Tensor, torch.int32, x, y | ||
| ) | ||
| class M(torch.nn.Module): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
function no longer supported?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not since #117528
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#119095 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: avikchaudhuri, tugsbayasgalan, ydwu4 Differential Revision: D53316196
0917c5f to
3369881
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D53316196 |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally' (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally) |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
XLA changes: pytorch/xla#6486 Test Plan: CI Differential Revision: D53316196 Pull Request resolved: #119095 Approved by: https://github.com/ydwu4, https://github.com/zhxchen17, https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan, https://github.com/avikchaudhuri, https://github.com/jerryzh168
XLA changes: pytorch/xla#6486
Test Plan: CI
Differential Revision: D53316196
cc @mrshenli @pritamdamania87 @zhaojuanmao @satgera @rohan-varma @gqchen @aazzolini @osalpekar @jiayisuse @H-Huang @kwen2501 @awgu @penguinwu @fegin @XilunWu @wanchaol @fduwjj @wz337 @tianyu-l @wconstab @yf225 @voznesenskym @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @aakhundov @kadeng