-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.3k
DISABLED test_nonstrict_trace_no_action_at_a_distance (__main__.DecoratorTests) #148034
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hello there! From the DISABLED prefix in this issue title, it looks like you are attempting to disable a test in PyTorch CI. The information I have parsed is below:
Within ~15 minutes, To modify the platforms list, please include a line in the issue body, like below. The default action will disable the test for all platforms if no platforms list is specified.
We currently support the following platforms: asan, dynamo, inductor, linux, mac, macos, rocm, slow, win, windows. How to re-enable a testTo re-enable the test globally, close the issue. To re-enable a test for only a subset of platforms, remove the platforms from the list in the issue body. This may take some time to propagate. To re-enable a test only for a PR, put |
Another case of trunk flakiness has been found here. The list of platforms [linux, mac, macos] appears to contain all the recently affected platforms [linux, mac, macos]. Either the change didn't propogate fast enough or disable bot might be broken. |
Another case of trunk flakiness has been found here. The list of platforms [linux, mac, macos] appears to contain all the recently affected platforms [linux, mac, macos]. Either the change didn't propogate fast enough or disable bot might be broken. |
…148385) This fixes a recent series of flaky failure from `nonstrict_trace` unit tests: #148166, #148056, #148055, #148054, #148034, #148033, #148032, #148031. For now we don't need to worry about the other decorators because they are either meant for builtin/numpy functions (which should never deallocate in practice), or used for polyfills which keeps the function object in `get_torch_obj_rule_map()`. Fixes #147777. Pull Request resolved: #148385 Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
This fixes a recent series of flaky failure from `nonstrict_trace` unit tests: #148166, #148056, #148055, #148054, #148034, #148033, #148032, #148031. For now we don't need to worry about the other decorators because they are either meant for builtin/numpy functions (which should never deallocate in practice), or used for polyfills which keeps the function object in `get_torch_obj_rule_map()`. Fixes #147777. ghstack-source-id: d9bea5f Pull Request resolved: #148385
Closed by #148385 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Platforms: linux, mac, macos
This test was disabled because it is failing in CI. See recent examples and the most recent trunk workflow logs.
Over the past 3 hours, it has been determined flaky in 5 workflow(s) with 5 failures and 5 successes.
Debugging instructions (after clicking on the recent samples link):
DO NOT ASSUME THINGS ARE OKAY IF THE CI IS GREEN. We now shield flaky tests from developers so CI will thus be green but it will be harder to parse the logs.
To find relevant log snippets:
test_nonstrict_trace_no_action_at_a_distance
Sample error message
Test file path:
dynamo/test_decorators.py
cc @clee2000 @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @kadeng @chauhang @amjames
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: