-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Conversation
…thon2.7-mono4.8.0-pythonnet2.3
…thon3.5-mono4.8.0-pythonnet2.3
We could remove the specified version and just make it generic so that we don't have to keep updating this for every version. If we going for version specific, it should be the full version |
The only reason it's specifically versioned is because of the combination of everything. Otherwise we could leave it more generic. |
LGTM. Sorry I've been a ghost for the past week. I've been really sick and am now coming out of it. Thanks for taking the initiative on this. Let me know if I can help any other way. |
It makes sense to freeze Python version, even mono to a certain degree, but I think we should float the |
@vmuriart I'm not sure how you would float the |
|
@vmuriart We shouldn't do that because it creates a moving target on Docker. If you overwrite the tag with a new version, only environments specifically looking to pull the latest will get the latest, so some environments will have an older version while others have a new one. It's against Docker best-practices. |
Docker assumes your tagged image will not change. |
makes sense then. ok to merge/squash once the full version name is used then ( |
I agree with full version name. |
…on2.7-mono4.8.0-pythonnet2.3.0
…on3.5-mono4.8.0-pythonnet2.3.0
@cowboygneox @vmuriart updated, why is there a dot at the end of this command? pythonnet-docker/build_and_deploy.sh Line 5 in d16fe95
|
@denfromufa the |
Should we setup Travis CI to build and push these images?
…On Mon, Mar 13, 2017, 5:13 PM Victor Uriarte ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #2 <#2>.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHgZ5XDNyIe1N0dWQ1QnkHh8lSKFDsLJks5rlb-EgaJpZM4MayLD>
.
|
IIRC, Travis doesn't provide the access necessary to build these images. Maybe they do now... |
@cowboygneox @vmuriart do you know why the
|
@vmuriart @cowboygneox only mono-complete amd64 4.8.0.520-0xamarin3 was found on my docker setup:
|
@denfromufa Even though there is Docker support on Windows, my impression is that it's better to avoid building images on Windows. I've had success with running pre-built images, standard or custom, but I've struggled to get Windows to reproduce the *nix environment necessary to build most images. tl;dr: I wouldn't use Windows to build Docker images. |
pythonnet/pythonnet#355
@vmuriart @cowboygneox please review