-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Delete stubs for cryptography
#9459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8bd2b21
Delete stubs for `cryptography`
AlexWaygood 1a7626e
Make pyright happy
AlexWaygood fa48deb
Add some lower bounds
AlexWaygood a0d060f
Merge branch 'main' into delete-cryptography
AlexWaygood 1ce3c36
Merge branch 'main' into delete-cryptography
AlexWaygood File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Add some lower bounds
- Loading branch information
commit fa48deb6f8d650523431a964c65ffc4bc476674f
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | ||
version = "23.0.*" | ||
requires = ["cryptography"] | ||
# Requires a version of cryptography with a `py.typed` file | ||
requires = ["cryptography>=35.0.0"] | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. I feel like it would make sense to always enforce a minimal version for external dependencies of 3rd party stub.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting idea — definitely something we should explore in the future!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without having to enforce it through CI. Maybe a mention in documentation that external dependencies should be at least pinned to their first
py.typed
version? And optimally to the oldest version that has the types referenced by the stub.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try to work on docs as soon as this PR makes it over the line — this is a very good point, thanks!