8000 "cadriciel" dans le glossaire by deronnax · Pull Request #1299 · python/python-docs-fr · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

"cadriciel" dans le glossaire #1299

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2020
Merged

"cadriciel" dans le glossaire #1299

merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2020

Conversation

deronnax
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@deronnax deronnax mentioned this pull request May 22, 2020
Merged
awecx
awecx approved these changes May 22, 2020
8000 View reviewed changes
Copy link
@awecx awecx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

J'approuve. Ça me coûte un peu de le dire mais il faut être conscients que ce n'est pas un terme très usité.
Ce n'est pas choquant de rappeler le terme originel, « framework» à la première occurrence sur la page.

@deronnax
Copy link
Collaborator Author
deronnax commented May 22, 2020 •
edited
Loading

100% d'accord. Je fais souvent ça sur une page : introduire le nouveau terme français (fil d'exécution, connecteur, chaîne d'octet, ...) informer de son équivalent en anglais dans la première phrase de la doc et utiliser le terme français partout ensuite.

@deronnax deronnax merged commit 35a2688 into python:3.8 May 22, 2020
@deronnax deronnax deleted the cadriciel_dans_glossaire branch May 22, 2020 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@awecx awecx awecx approved these changes

Assignees < 4B79 /div> No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@deronnax @awecx
0