10000 PEP 772: As with PEP 13, seconding a vote of no confidence should be open for one week by warsaw · Pull Request #4384 · python/peps · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

PEP 772: As with PEP 13, seconding a vote of no confidence should be open for one week #4384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2025
Merged

PEP 772: As with PEP 13, seconding a vote of no confidence should be open for one week #4384

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2025

Conversation

warsaw
Copy link
Member
@warsaw warsaw commented Apr 23, 2025 •
edited by hugovk
Loading

As per this discussion on DPO. The intention is to align PEP 772 with PEP 13.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4384.org.readthedocs.build/

@warsaw warsaw requested a review from hugovk April 23, 2025 17:55
@warsaw warsaw self-assigned this Apr 23, 2025
@warsaw warsaw requested a review from pradyunsg as a code owner April 23, 2025 17:55
@hugovk hugovk changed the title As with PEP 13, seconding a vote of no confidence should be open for … PEP 772: As with PEP 13, seconding a vote of no confidence should be open for one week Apr 23, 2025
hugovk
hugovk approved these changes Apr 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@warsaw warsaw merged commit 45e6128 into python:main Apr 23, 2025
6 checks passed
@warsaw warsaw deleted the pep-772-followup branch April 23, 2025 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hugovk hugovk hugovk approved these changes

@pradyunsg pradyunsg Awaiting requested review from pradyunsg pradyunsg is a code owner

Assignees

@warsaw warsaw

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@warsaw @hugovk
0