-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Lint: call tools inside venv using make's PYTHON #2408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>
venv: | ||
@if [ -d $(VENVDIR) ] ; then \ | ||
echo "venv already exists."; \ | ||
echo "To recreate it, remove it first with \`make clean-venv'."; \ | ||
else \ | ||
$(PYTHON) -m venv $(VENVDIR); \ | ||
$(VENVDIR)/bin/python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt; \ | ||
echo "The venv has been created in the $(VENVDIR) directory"; \ | ||
fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sort of goes against the point of make
as I understand it -- if the name exists on the filesystem then make
won't run the target, whereas we need a lot of logic here to do the same thing and support customisation of the venv
directory.
I really don't want to overcomplicate this -- whilst I have a desire to make usability better for PEP authors, no-one complained up until now, and so we should balance usability to PEP authors for whom the current Makefile doesn't work and maintainability to ourselves.
A
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, make
is
10000
primarily for building/compiling files but this sort of thing is pretty common too.
This one is based on the CPython docs Makefile
:
venv:
@if [ -d $(VENVDIR) ] ; then \
echo "venv already exists."; \
echo "To recreate it, remove it first with \`make clean-venv'."; \
else \
$(PYTHON) -m venv $(VENVDIR); \
$(VENVDIR)/bin/python3 -m pip install -U pip setuptools; \
$(VENVDIR)/bin/python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt; \
echo "The venv has been created in the $(VENVDIR) directory"; \
fi
The devguide's Makefile
is similar:
venv:
$(PYTHON) -m venv venv
./venv/bin/python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip
./venv/bin/python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt
I'm sure I've seen similar in other https://github.com/python Makefile
s, so using venvs is a fairy common pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a make expert, but as a general principle, I don't think we should let purity override practicality here, particularly when it comes to usability for PEP authors and contributors. We certainly want to reduce friction there as much as practical, and given all the changes lately and the remaining ones we want to do, making things easier rather than harder for users helps all that go more smoothly for everyone.
JOBS=8 | ||
RENDER_COMMAND=$(PYTHON) build.py -j $(JOBS) | ||
RENDER_COMMAND=$(VENVDIR)/bin/python3 build.py -j $(JOBS) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If one installs make
on windows, this would fail, right? As the executables directory is Scripts
.
A
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't use make
on Windows, I've often seen a separate make.bat
though so I think that is used instead of Makefile
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AA-Turner correct, this is Unix-only. The PYTHON
variable could be updated to use VENVDIR
, but that would also allow for overriding the path to the Python executable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do have make
on my Windows dev machines and use it when necessary sometimes, but at least on this repo I don't really do so, and instead run the various commands I need directly (usually with custom invocations). I wouldn't expect very many if any non-WSL Windows users to do so either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a make expert, but this LGTM aside from one not directly related concern. Thanks, @hugovk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a domain expert, so leaving this to someone else to merge!
A
For #2402.
Fixes #2403.
The pre-commit tool can be called as a module as
pre_commit
: pre-commit/pre-commit#1627 (comment)This allows us to choose which Python version to use:
And the tools are installed inside a venv using the given Python version.
This is based on the CPython docs
makefile
and devguidemakefile
, so should follow a familiar pattern.