-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 882
Trivial: Fix broken link for Peephole Optimizer Paper #235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I'm not sure that legacy.python.org will not disappear one time. Maybe @smontanaro have more stable link to his paper? |
I took down www.smontanaro.net. If you like (and want to avoid adding legacy.python.org references), I can put a copy up on Google Drive or Dropbox, or just send you a copy you can drop into place on the website itself. |
A link to Drive or Dropbox would also work. |
We could also just move the paper to non-legacy python.org. |
When I get home this evening, I'll toss it up on Google Drive. From there
you can copy it (or not) wherever you think best.
…On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Serhiy Storchaka ***@***.***> wrote:
We could also just move the paper to non-legacy python.org.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#235 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRNoafF9x5kgem--V2A8_wTIX7GYoZwks5sIAfXgaJpZM4OEm6U>
.
|
Here it is. Let me know if you can't view it:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2InO7qBBGRXQXlDM3FVdWZxQWc
Skip
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
wrote:
… When I get home this evening, I'll toss it up on Google Drive. From there
you can copy it (or not) wherever you think best.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <
***@***.***> wrote:
> We could also just move the paper to non-legacy python.org.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#235 (comment)>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRNoafF9x5kgem--V2A8_wTIX7GYoZwks5sIAfXgaJpZM4OEm6U>
> .
>
|
@smontanaro I can view it (it's raw HTML instead of rendered HTML, but since this is a historical document I think that's fine). |
I hope it's fine. I'm not going to go back and mess with it at this point.
:-)
…On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Brett Cannon ***@***.***> wrote:
@smontanaro <https://github.com/smontanaro> I can view it (it's raw HTML
instead of rendered HTML, but since this is a historical document I think
that's fine).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#235 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRNocoTkOkTi5rWd3PsHTS9gALfeeiwks5sIDFKgaJpZM4OEm6U>
.
|
Thanks everyone for helping out! |
The old link for this paper is broken (or at least doesn't link to the paper in question). A quick google search revealed a few other places where the paper can be found. I opted for the link on legacy.python.org but any of the other links could be used if they better suit the documentation style.
I've run
make html
and it seems to have worked fine 😄