-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.3k
Change links to label refs #98454
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Change links to label refs #98454
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bbf7381
Change links to label refs
slateny 7613ba7
Add missed label and ref
slateny 20fa1fb
Use more specific label name
slateny 9fe6bfd
Change some more links to labels
slateny 6abd61c
Follow convention for label naming, add link to inspect module
slateny File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Change some more links to labels
- Loading branch information
commit 9fe6bfda041f47f718fee1d7a57c677db6d4b4ee
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ event loop only if called from the main thread. | |||||
.. section: Documentation | ||||||
|
||||||
Add an entry for ``__module__`` in the "function" & "method" sections of the | ||||||
`inspect docs types and members table | ||||||
<https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html#types-and-members>`_ | ||||||
:ref:`inspect docs types and members table <inspect-types>`. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Seems a bit cleaner to do
Suggested change
|
||||||
|
||||||
.. | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sidenote: Following the convention I've used for the 3.11 What's New would be
whatsnew36-venv
, but I think this convention (or at leastwhatsnew3.6-venv
) would be better—out of old habit I often avoid using.
in ref target labels. In any case, no practical reason to change it here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the confusion—I was mentioning this as a sidenote and suggestion you not change it here (instead, I really should be using it in the ref targets I'm adding, though probably too late now for 3.11—I can adopt it with 3.12). But since you have changed it, not really worth changing it again.
Just to be more clear for the future, if I'm actually requesting a change, I will pretty much always make it as a actual suggestion (unless its impractical or impossible), so you can easily apply it with
Files
->Add to batch
->Commit
rather than manually implementing, committing, pushing and resolving it. The way I see it is if I'm going to ask someone else to make a change on their PR (unless its really important), its only fair that I put in the work myself to implement it, so all they have to do is click a button to accept it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see I see, don't worry too much about it - I checked the existing labels and just decided that it would be good to follow convention. And conversely, I requested the review so I definitely don't mind the work (and I would have to run it locally anyway just to check the rendering), but of course the ease of changing is always appreciated.