-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
GH-93899: fix checks for eventfd flags #95170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but os_eventfd_impl
could also use a wrapper, and some of the tests should skip if these flags are not present.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Added guard to
The tests are already skipped on older kernel versions. Lines 3686 to 3690 in 3c94d33
I have made the requested changes; please review again |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @erlend-aasland: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you actually want to support ancient Kernels, then let's use consistent checks.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. You may consider to make the NEWS entry a little bit more specific ("older kernel versions" is a bit vague).
Thanks for the review! I have reworded news entry, should be better now! |
Thanks, I'm fine with that. I'll land it as soon as the CI is green and I get a final approval from @tiran. Thanks! |
Thanks @kumaraditya303 for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
Sorry, @kumaraditya303, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry @kumaraditya303, I had trouble checking out the |
Will you fix the backports, Kumar? It's probably just a clinic regen that's missing. (Can we teach Miss I to do that?) |
GH-95342 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
(cherry picked from commit 4dd099b) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
GH-95345 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
Done |
(cherry picked from commit 4dd099b) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:tiran