8000 [3.11] gh-95095: Use SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version instead of SSL_CTX_ctrl (GH-95096) by miss-islington · Pull Request #95101 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[3.11] gh-95095: Use SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version instead of SSL_CTX_ctrl (GH-95096) #95101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor
@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 21, 2022

The wrapper macros are more readable and match the form recommended in
the OpenSSL documentation. They also slightly less error-prone, as the
mapping of arguments to SSL_CTX_ctrl is not always clear. (Though in
this case it's straightforward.)
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version.html
(cherry picked from commit 936f71e)

Co-authored-by: David Benjamin davidben@davidben.net

…ctrl (pythonGH-95096)

The wrapper macros are more readable and match the form recommended in
the OpenSSL documentation. They also slightly less error-prone, as the
mapping of arguments to SSL_CTX_ctrl is not always clear. (Though in
this case it's straightforward.)
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version.html
(cherry picked from commit 936f71e)

Co-authored-by: David Benjamin <davidben@davidben.net>
@ghost
Copy link
ghost commented Jul 21, 2022

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidben: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidben: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidben: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidben: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@tiran
Copy link
Member
tiran commented Jul 21, 2022

@davidben For some reasons the automatic backport has a different email address than your initial commit. I'm not entire sure what is going on here...

8000
@davidben
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure either. Seems like a bug but probably not worth fussing over. Pressed more buttons. Hopefully it's happy now?

@tiran
Copy link
Member
tiran commented Jul 21, 2022

CLA bot is a happy bot now. Thanks :)

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 120f226 into python:3.11 Jul 21, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-936f71e-3.11 branch July 21, 2022 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0