8000 [3.5] bpo-32072: Fix issues with binary plists. (GH-4455) by serhiy-storchaka · Pull Request #4656 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[3.5] bpo-32072: Fix issues with binary plists. (GH-4455) #4656

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2018

Conversation

serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Nov 30, 2017
  • Fixed saving bytearrays.
  • Identical objects will be saved only once.
  • Equal references will be load as identical objects.
  • Added support for saving and loading recursive data structures.
    (cherry picked from commit a897aee)

https://bugs.python.org/issue32072

* Fixed saving bytearrays.
* Identical objects will be saved only once.
* Equal references will be load as identical objects.
* Added support for saving and loading recursive data structures.
(cherry picked from commit a897aee)
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error type-security A security issue labels Nov 30, 2017
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error type-security A security issue labels Nov 30, 2017
@larryhastings
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know anything about "plists". Can you find another core dev to review this PR?

@larryhastings larryhastings merged commit 43f014d into python:3.5 Jan 23, 2018
@larryhastings
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka deleted the backport-a897aee-3.5 branch February 19, 2024 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error type-security A security issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0