You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Python 3.5, PyDict_DelItem won't resize dict. So cached == dict->ma_keys in most cases.
One exception is callback called by weakref or __del__ inserts some items to the dict and resize happened.
In this case, cached != CACHED_KEYS(tp), so DK_DECREF(cached) will be "use-after-free".
In such case, the insertion from the callback would update CACHED_KEYS(tp) correctly.
So clearing CACHED_KEYS(tp) doesn't make sense for most case.
Even when the callback inserts items through __dict__ (not regular attribute access), skipping CACHED_KEYS(tp) = NULL
doesn't cause uncontrolled memory growth. And it happens very rarely.
So I think this code is not worth enough.
else {
int was_shared = cached == ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys;
int was_shared = (cached == ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys);
res = PyDict_SetItem(dict, key, value);
/* PyDict_SetItem() may call dictresize() and convert split table
* into combined table. In such case, convert it to split
* table again and update type's shared key only when this is
* the only dict sharing key with the type.
*/
if (was_shared && cached != ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys) {
if (was_shared &&
(cached = CACHED_KEYS(tp)) != NULL &&
cached != ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys) {
if (cached->dk_refcnt == 1) {
CACHED_KEYS(tp) = make_keys_shared(dict);
} else {
Expand Down
3A31
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why these lines are deleted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Python 3.5, PyDict_DelItem won't resize dict. So
cached == dict->ma_keys
in most cases.One exception is callback called by weakref or
__del__
inserts some items to the dict and resize happened.In this case,
cached != CACHED_KEYS(tp)
, soDK_DECREF(cached)
will be "use-after-free".In such case, the insertion from the callback would update
CACHED_KEYS(tp)
correctly.So clearing
CACHED_KEYS(tp)
doesn't make sense for most case.Even when the callback inserts items through
__dict__
(not regular attribute access), skippingCACHED_KEYS(tp) = NULL
doesn't cause uncontrolled memory growth. And it happens very rarely.
So I think this code is not worth enough.