8000 [doc] Clarify MRO precedence in descriptor super binding section by joukewitteveen · Pull Request #29539 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[doc] Clarify MRO precedence in descriptor super binding section #29539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2021

Conversation

joukewitteveen
Copy link
Contributor

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor howto, where it is already correct.


This is a trivial change.

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor howto, where it is already correct.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels Nov 12, 2021
@ambv ambv changed the title Fix typo in data model documentation [doc] Clarify MRO precedence in descriptor super binding section Nov 20, 2021
@ambv ambv merged commit ee49484 into python:main Nov 20, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @joukewitteveen for the PR, and @ambv for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9, 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-29669 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
8000

GH-29670 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Nov 20, 2021
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2021
…honGH-29539)

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor HOWTO, where it is already correct.
(cherry picked from commit ee49484)

Co-authored-by: Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen@gmail.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2021
…honGH-29539)

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor HOWTO, where it is already correct.
(cherry picked from commit ee49484)

Co-authored-by: Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen@gmail.com>
remykarem pushed a commit to remykarem/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
…honGH-29539)

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor HOWTO, where it is already correct.
ambv pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2021
…29539) (GH-29669)

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor HOWTO, where it is already correct.
(cherry picked from commit ee49484)

Co-authored-by: Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen@gmail.com>
ambv pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2021
…29539) (GH-29670)

A similar sentence is present in the 'Invocation from super' section of
the descriptor HOWTO, where it is already correct.
(cherry picked from commit ee49484)

Co-authored-by: Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen@gmail.com>
@joukewitteveen joukewitteveen deleted the doc-datamodel-typo branch March 27, 2022 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
0