8000 bpo-44935: enable posix_spawn() on Solaris by kulikjak · Pull Request #27795 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

bpo-44935: enable posix_spawn() on Solaris #27795

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor
@kulikjak kulikjak commented Aug 17, 2021

Solaris also provides posix_spawn() syscall that can/should be used in the subprocess module to spawn new processes.

https://bugs.python.org/issue44935

@gpshead gpshead merged commit b1930bf into python:main Aug 17, 2021
@gpshead gpshead added the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Aug 17, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @kulikjak for the PR, and @gpshead for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Aug 17, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-27800 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
Enable posix_spawn() on Solaris
(cherry picked from commit b1930bf)

Co-authored-by: Jakub Kulík <Kulikjak@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
Enable posix_spawn() on Solaris
(cherry picked from commit b1930bf)


Co-authored-by: Jakub Kulík <Kulikjak@gmail.com>

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead
@kulikjak
Copy link
Contributor Author
kulikjak commented Aug 18, 2021

Thanks @gpshead for the merge and backport!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
0