8000 bpo-44651: delete entry of "coercion" in Doc/glossary.rst by StevenHsuYL · Pull Request #27226 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

bpo-44651: delete entry of "coercion" in Doc/glossary.rst #27226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2021

Conversation

StevenHsuYL
Copy link
Contributor
@StevenHsuYL StevenHsuYL commented Jul 18, 2021

The definition of "coercion" in Doc/glossary.rst was unclear in some aspects.
After discussion about the history and current status of this entry, deletion of it was suggested in conclusion.

Thanks for review.

https://bugs.python.org/issue44651

bpo 44651: delete entry of "coercion".
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Jul 18, 2021
@mdickinson
Copy link
Member

LGTM. Please could you add a news entry? (See the instructions in the developer guide, here: https://devguide.python.org/committing/?highlight=blurb#updating-news-and-what-s-new-in-python)

news entry for bpo-44651
Copy link
Member
@mdickinson mdickinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you for the contribution! I'll leave this open for a couple of days in case any other core devs want to comment.

@mdickinson mdickinson merged commit c05a790 into python:main Jul 22, 2021
sthagen added a commit to sthagen/python-cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
bpo-44651: delete entry of "coercion" in Doc/glossary.rst (pythonGH-27226)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0