8000 [3.9] bpo-40897: Partially backport GH-22583's refactor of inspect.py to allow bugfix backports by ambv · Pull Request #27193 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-40897: Partially backport GH-22583's refactor of inspect.py to allow bugfix backports #27193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2021

Conversation

ambv
Copy link
Contributor
@ambv ambv commented Jul 16, 2021

The backport in this PR is entirely about the introduction of the internal partial _get_signature_of. No external functional change.

The goal is to allow 3.9 backport of #27177.

https://bugs.python.org/issue40897

@ambv ambv changed the title bpo-40897: Partially backport GH-22583's refactor of inspect.py to allow bugfix backports [3.9] bpo-40897: Partially backport GH-22583's refactor of inspect.py to allow bugfix backports Jul 16, 2021
@ambv ambv added the skip news label Jul 16, 2021
@ambv
Copy link
Contributor Author
ambv commented Jul 16, 2021

Skipped news for this one. There will be a NEWS entry for the bugfix in GH-27177.

@ambv ambv requested a review from gvanrossum July 16, 2021 15:29
@ambv
Copy link
Contributor Author
ambv commented Jul 16, 2021

Asked you for review @gvanrossum since you reviewed the original change in GH-22583.

Copy link
Member
@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@ambv ambv merged commit ed2db9b into python:3.9 Jul 17, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@ambv: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@ambv ambv deleted the bpo40897-backport branch July 17, 2021 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0