-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
bpo-44338: Port LOAD_GLOBAL to PEP 659 adaptive interpreter #26638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
markshannon
merged 11 commits into
python:main
from
faster-cpython:specialize-load-global
Jun 14, 2021
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6e57707
Add specializations of LOAD_GLOBAL.
markshannon b970dfc
Add more stats.
markshannon 2b7aad1
Remove old opcache; it is no longer used.
markshannon 20daa07
Use _PyDict_GetItemHint instead of _Py_dict_lookup
markshannon 704d217
Check globals version as well as builtins
markshannon a7746e0
Correctly round sizeof() for code object.
markshannon 8ad3e55
Add NEWS
markshannon aec7872
Remove some code duplication and fix up stats printing.
markshannon b4431be
Add casts and comment on which type of cache entries are used.
markshannon f043576
Fix a couple of copy and paste errors
markshannon 72a7bcc
Merge branch 'main' into specialize-load-global
markshannon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Fix a couple of copy and paste errors
- Loading branch information
commit f043576ed38ddecd6c0d3e909a124d10a9877fdc
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we also need to check the case where it's a different globals dict? It can't be done from Python (except if someone creates a new function using the code object from another function, or passes the code object to
exec()
) but can easily be done from C. There is the remote chance that (in that already unlikely case) the keys version is the same.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the keys version is the same, then it has the same keys in the same order and is the same kind of dict.
In which case it doesn't matter if it is a different dictionary, because we cache the index, not the value.
As an aside, you can get different dictionaries with the same keys as module dicts at different times.