8000 [3.8] bpo-35293: Travis CI uses "make venv" for the doc (GH-22307) (GH-22309) by vstinner · Pull Request #22310 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-35293: Travis CI uses "make venv" for the doc (GH-22307) (GH-22309) #22310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020
Merged

[3.8] bpo-35293: Travis CI uses "make venv" for the doc (GH-22307) (GH-22309) #22310

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member
@vstinner vstinner commented Sep 18, 2020

Doc/requirements.txt becomes the reference for packages and package
versions needed to build the Python documentation.

  • Doc/Makefile now uses Doc/requirements.txt
  • .travis.yml now uses "make env" of Doc/Makefile
  • Update Sphinx to version 2.4.4

(cherry picked from commit 8394500)
(cherry picked from commit 9e73cac)

https://bugs.python.org/issue35293

Doc/requirements.txt becomes the reference for packages and package
versions needed to build the Python documentation.

* Doc/Makefile now uses Doc/requirements.txt
* .travis.yml now uses "make env" of Doc/Makefile
* Update Sphinx to version 2.4.4

(cherry picked from commit 8394500)
(cherry picked from commit 9e73cac)
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

Before this PR, Travis CI used Sphinx 1.8.2, whereas Doc/Makefile used Sphinx 2.3.1.

Now both use Sphinx 2.4.4.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

There is no more warning in the Documentation build job of Travis CI: this PR fix https://bugs.python.org/issue35293 in the 3.8 branch.

@vstinner vstinner merged commit 3acc403 into python:3.8 Sep 18, 2020
@vstinner vstinner deleted the travis_make_venv38 branch September 18, 2020 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0