8000 [3.9] bpo-41218: Only mark async code with CO_COROUTINE. (GH-21357) by pablogsal · Pull Request #21362 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-41218: Only mark async code with CO_COROUTINE. (GH-21357) #21362

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020
Merged

[3.9] bpo-41218: Only mark async code with CO_COROUTINE. (GH-21357) #21362

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

pablogsal
Copy link
Member
@pablogsal pablogsal commented Jul 6, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

3.8.3 had a regression where compiling with
ast.PyCF_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL_AWAIT woudl agressively mark things are
coroutine even if there were not.
(cherry picked from commit bd46174)

Co-authored-by: Matthias Bussonnier bussonniermatthias@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue41218

@Carreau @pablogsal
[3.9] bpo-41218: Only mark async code with CO_COROUTINE. (pythonGH-21357
4c6299a 
)

3.8.3 had a regression where compiling with
ast.PyCF_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL_AWAIT woudl agressively mark things are
coroutine even if there were not.
(cherry picked from commit bd46174)

Co-authored-by: Matthias Bussonnier <bussonniermatthias@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2020
Merged
@pablogsal pablogsal requested a review from ambv July 6, 2020 21:29
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 6488a4a into python:3.9 Jul 6, 2020
@pablogsal pablogsal deleted the backport-bd46174-3.9 branch May 19, 2021 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ambv ambv Awaiting requested review from ambv

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@pablogsal @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @Carreau
0