[3.7] bpo-34226: fix cgi.parse_multipart without content_length (GH-8530) #20892
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
) In Python 3.7 the behavior of parse_multipart changed requiring CONTENT-LENGTH header, this fix remove this header as required and fix FieldStorage read_lines_to_outerboundary, by not using limit when it's negative, since by default it's -1 if not content-length and keeps substracting what was read from the file object. Also added a test case for this problem. (cherry picked from commit d8cf351) Co-authored-by: roger <rogerduran@gmail.com>
|
@Roger: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
ned-deily
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Python 3.7 the behavior of parse_multipart changed requiring CONTENT-LENGTH
header, this fix remove this header as required and fix FieldStorage
read_lines_to_outerboundary, by not using limit when it's negative,
since by default it's -1 if not content-length and keeps substracting what
was read from the file object.
Also added a test case for this problem.
(cherry picked from commit d8cf351)
Co-authored-by: roger rogerduran@gmail.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue34226
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ned-deily