10000 bpo-39943: Keep constness of pointer objects. by petdance · Pull Request #19186 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

bpo-39943: Keep constness of pointer objects. #19186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

bpo-39943: Keep constness of pointer objects. #19186

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 7 additions & 6 deletions Objects/typeobject.c
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ type_get_bases(PyTypeObject *type, void *context)

static PyTypeObject *best_base(PyObject *);
static int mro_internal(PyTypeObject *, PyObject **);
static int type_is_subtype_base_chain(PyTypeObject *, PyTypeObject *);
static int type_is_subtype_base_chain(const PyTypeObject *, const PyTypeObject *);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not add const to PyObject pointers (and PyTypeObject is a subtype of PyObject). They are inherently mutable. If the particular function does not mutate them in the particular Python version, it is just an implementation detail.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will do. I know we've discussed before, but this was an old branch. Sorry. I'll resubmit.

static int compatible_for_assignment(PyTypeObject *, PyTypeObject *, const char *);
static int add_subclass(PyTypeObject*, PyTypeObject*);
static int add_all_subclasses(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *bases);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ static PyTypeObject *solid_base(PyTypeObject *type);
/* type test with subclassing support */

static int
type_is_subtype_base_chain(PyTypeObject *a, PyTypeObject *b)
type_is_subtype_base_chain(const PyTypeObject *a, const PyTypeObject *b)
{
do {
if (a == b)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2850,17 +2850,18 @@ PyObject *
PyType_FromSpecWithBases(PyType_Spec *spec, PyObject *bases)
{
PyHeapTypeObject *res;
PyMemberDef *memb;
PyObject *modname;
PyTypeObject *type, *base;

PyType_Slot *slot;
const PyType_Slot *slot;
Py_ssize_t nmembers, weaklistoffset, dictoffset;
char *s, *res_start;
const char *s;
char *res_start;

nmembers = weaklistoffset = dictoffset = 0;
for (slot = spec->slots; slot->slot; slot++) {
if (slot->slot == Py_tp_members) {
const PyMemberDef *memb;
nmembers = 0;
for (memb = slot->pfunc; memb->name != NULL; memb++) {
nmembers++;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2894,7 +2895,7 @@ PyType_FromSpecWithBases(PyType_Spec *spec, PyObject *bases)
/* Set the type name and qualname */
s = strrchr(spec->name, '.');
if (s == NULL)
s = (char*)spec->name;
s = spec->name;
else
s++;

Expand Down
0