8000 [3.8] closes bpo-27805: Ignore ESPIPE in initializing seek of append-mode files. (GH-17112) by benjaminp · Pull Request #17136 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[3.8] closes bpo-27805: Ignore ESPIPE in initializing seek of append-mode files. (GH-17112) #17136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2019
Merged

[3.8] closes bpo-27805: Ignore ESPIPE in initializing seek of append-mode files. (GH-17112) #17136

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2019

Conversation

benjaminp
Copy link
Contributor
@benjaminp benjaminp commented Nov 12, 2019 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

This change, which follows the behavior of C stdio's fdopen and Python 2's file object, allows pipes to be opened in append mode..
(cherry picked from commit 74fa9f7)

https://bugs.python.org/issue27805

@benjaminp
[3.8] closes bpo-27805: Ignore ESPIPE in initializing seek of append-…
7645aa9 
…mode files. (GH-17112)

This change, which follows the behavior of C stdio's fdopen and Python 2's file object, allows pipes to be opened in append mode..
(cherry picked from commit 74fa9f7)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Merged
@benjaminp benjaminp closed this Nov 12, 2019
@benjaminp benjaminp reopened this Nov 12, 2019
@benjaminp benjaminp merged commit 9788f97 into 3.8 Nov 12, 2019
@benjaminp benjaminp deleted the backport-74fa9f7-3.8 branch November 12, 2019 23:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@benjaminp @bedevere-bot
0