8000 [3.8] bpo-37685: Fixed comparisons of datetime.timedelta and datetime.timezone. (GH-14996) by miss-islington · Pull Request #15102 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-37685: Fixed comparisons of datetime.timedelta and datetime.timezone. (GH-14996) #15102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2019

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor
@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 4, 2019

There was a discrepancy between the Python and C implementations.

Add singletons ALWAYS_EQ, LARGEST and SMALLEST in test.support
to test mixed type comparison.
(cherry picked from commit 17e5264)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka storchaka@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue37685

…one. (pythonGH-14996)

There was a discrepancy between the Python and C implementations.

Add singletons ALWAYS_EQ, LARGEST and SMALLEST in test.support
to test mixed type comparison.
(cherry picked from commit 17e5264)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit dde944f into python:3.8 Aug 4, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-17e5264-3.8 branch August 4, 2019 10:01
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0