-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
gh-134584: Eliminate redundant refcounting from _BINARY_OP_ADD_UNICODE #135817
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
d5afe15
46b423f
c901079
ea112a5
d95aee9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe also add
to make sure this is the op that's actually generated?
Should we also test for
_POP_TOP_UNICODE
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this code, It will be replaced to
_POP_TOP_NOP
because_POP_TOP_UNICODE
will be optimized to_POP_TOP_NOP
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, do you think it makes sense to test
_POP_TOP_UNICODE
separately? That is, the case when it is not optimized to_POP_TOP_NOP
? (not sure how difficult it'll be to come up with a test case though)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a test for that in my original PR already.