-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
GH-132554: Specialize GET_ITER
and FOR_ITER
for range
#135063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
markshannon
wants to merge
23
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
faster-cpython:specialize-for-iter-range
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,422
−703
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4e34e27
Specialize GET_ITER
markshannon 37757c6
Add news
markshannon 658a422
Specialize FOR_ITER for ranges using tagged ints
markshannon 8cf4e6e
Allow range starts other than zero
markshannon 11117b4
Specialize GET_ITER for range
markshannon d6f033f
Fix assert
markshannon 4679ccc
Fix GET_ITER stats
markshannon 06c1680
Fix stats for FOR_ITER specialization
markshannon 15cb250
Remove unused function
markshannon 89d5d85
Correct comment
markshannon 9f688e7
Fix merge glitch
markshannon 7325b44
Fix tier 2 unspecialized iteration over ranges
markshannon e5f666d
Make functions inline for the JIT
markshannon 8efce0a
Make PyStackRef_BoxInt inline for JIT
markshannon 94ad6f9
Merge branch 'main' into specialize-for-iter-range
markshannon 7ba5753
Fix PyStackRef_TaggedIntLessThan for Py_STACKREF_DEBUG
markshannon 7553e10
Merge branch 'main' into specialize-for-iter-range
markshannon baf4722
Merge branch 'main' into specialize-for-iter-range
markshannon 122a816
Cleanup _ITER_JUMP_TUPLE
markshannon 9b65402
Merge branch 'main' into specialize-for-iter-range
markshannon 4e44e85
Extend iteration by index to strings and bytes
markshannon c41d531
Streamline non-specialized FOR_ITER
markshannon 47520ee
Convert INSTRUMENTED_FOR_ITER into macro.
markshannon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Specialize FOR_ITER for ranges using tagged ints
- Loading branch information
commit 658a4225669e6fab85ffdecf3b19bfc847914672
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
_PyForIter_NextWithIndex
handles the exact lists and exact tuples.In this PR we have the code to handle
range
iteration by pushing the index and limit to the stack. Could we simplify_PyForIter_NextWithIndex
to only deal with lists and for tuples push the index and length of the tuple to the stack (e.g. use the same approach as range)?(if this is possible maybe in a followup PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you proposing pushing a third value to the stack during iteration?
I doubt that would be worth it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Might not be worth it indeed, but I will check once this pr has settled.