10000 gh-69605: Disable PyREPL module autocomplete fallback on regular completion by loic-simon · Pull Request #134181 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

gh-69605: Disable PyREPL module autocomplete fallback on regular completion #134181 8000

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

gh-69605: Disable PyREPL module autocomplete fallback on regular completion #134181

wants to merge 7 commits into from
+27 −12

Conversation

loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor
@loic-simon loic-simon commented May 18, 2025 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

When no module completions are available, do not fallback on completions from current namespace, as there are not relevant.

Before:

>>> import pri<TAB>
>>> import print(
>>>
>>> from typing import Na<TAB>
>>> from typing import NameError(

After:

>>> import pri<TAB>
>>> import pri
>>>
>>> from typing import Na<TAB>
>>> from typing import Na

cc @tomasr8

PyREPL module autocomplete: do not fallback
8978e95 
When no module completions are available, do not fallback to completions from current namespace
@bedevere-app
Copy link
bedevere-app bot commented May 18, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request May 18, 2025
Open
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity requested a review from tomasr8 May 18, 2025 14:34
tomasr8
tomasr8 reviewed May 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@tomasr8 tomasr8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Overall approach looks good, I just have some nitpicks 🙂

tomasr8
tomasr8 approved these changes May 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@tomasr8 tomasr8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tomasr8 tomasr8 tomasr8 approved these changes

@pablogsal pablogsal Awaiting requested review from pablogsal pablogsal is a code owner

@lysnikolaou lysnikolaou Awaiting requested review from lysnikolaou lysnikolaou is a code owner

@ambv ambv Awaiting requested review from ambv ambv is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
awaiting core review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@loic-simon @tomasr8
0