8000 gh-61103: drop unused Py_HAVE_C_COMPLEX define by skirpichev · Pull Request #133435 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

gh-61103: drop unused Py_HAVE_C_COMPLEX define #133435

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2025
Merged

gh-61103: drop unused Py_HAVE_C_COMPLEX define #133435

merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2025

Conversation

skirpichev
Copy link
Member
@skirpichev skirpichev commented May 5, 2025 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

The Py_FFI_SUPPORT_C_COMPLEX check configure check imply support for complex types.

@skirpichev skirpichev requested a review from encukou May 5, 2025 12:58
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request May 5, 2025
Closed
@skirpichev
pythongh-61103: drop unused Py_HAVE_C_COMPLEX define
92c89f8 
The Py_FFI_SUPPORT_C_COMPLEX check configure check imply support for
complex types.
@skirpichev skirpichev force-pushed the remove-ccomplex-test/61103 branch from 782e2b4 to 92c89f8 Compare May 5, 2025 13:08
@encukou encukou merged commit 1bc1650 into python:main May 5, 2025
38 checks passed
@skirpichev skirpichev deleted the remove-ccomplex-test/61103 branch May 5, 2025 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@encukou encukou Awaiting requested review from encukou

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland Awaiting requested review from erlend-aasland erlend-aasland is a code owner

@corona10 corona10 Awaiting requested review from corona10 corona10 is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@skirpichev @encukou
0