8000 Draft: gh-123471: Make concurrent iteration over itertools.pairwise safe under free-threading by eendebakpt · Pull Request #125417 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Draft: gh-123471: Make concurrent iteration over itertools.pairwise safe under free-threading #125417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Draft: gh-123471: Make concurrent iteration over itertools.pairwise safe under free-threading #125417

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d7cbe16
Make pairwise_next safe for free-threading
eendebakpt Oct 13, 2024
c7ffc4f
refactor
eendebakpt Oct 14, 2024
fdc7b01
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] Oct 14, 2024
e111e10
Merge branch 'main' into pairwise_v2
eendebakpt Oct 14, 2024
d6c48fc
Merge branch 'main' into pairwise_v2
eendebakpt Jan 28, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Make pairwise_next safe for free-threading
  • Loading branch information
@eendebakpt
eendebakpt committed Oct 13, 2024
commit d7cbe1695b607b8a5bd06dacb46af9268033252e
27 changes: 17 additions & 10 deletions Modules/itertoolsmodule.c
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -327,37 +327,43 @@ pairwise_traverse(pairwiseobject *po, visitproc visit, void *arg)
static PyObject *
pairwise_next(pairwiseobject *po)
{
PyObject *it = po->it;
PyObject *old = po->old;
PyObject *new, *result;

PyObject *it = Py_XNewRef(po->it);
if (it == NULL) {
return NULL;
}

PyObject *old = Py_XNewRef(po->old);
PyObject *new, *result;

if (old == NULL) {
old = (*Py_TYPE(it)->tp_iternext)(it);
Py_XSETREF(po->old, old);
if (old == NULL) {
Py_CLEAR(po->it);
Py_DECREF(it);
return NULL;
}
it = po->it;
if (it == NULL) {
Py_XSETREF(po->old, Py A7D6 _NewRef(old));
if (po->it == NULL) {
// for re-entrant calls to pairwise next. the actual behavior is not important and this does not avoid any bugs (or does it?)
// the reason for having it is to make the behaviour equal to the python implementation behavior
Py_CLEAR(po->old);
Py_DECREF(old);
Py_DECREF(it);
return NULL;
}
}
Py_INCREF(old);

new = (*Py_TYPE(it)->tp_iternext)(it);
if (new == NULL) {
Py_CLEAR(po->it);
Py_CLEAR(po->old);
Py_DECREF(it);
Py_DECREF(old);
return NULL;
}

result = po->result;
if (Py_REFCNT(result) == 1) {
if (_PyObject_IsUniquelyReferenced(result)) {
Py_INCREF(result);
PyObject *last_old = PyTuple_GET_ITEM(result, 0);
PyObject *last_new = PyTuple_GET_ITEM(result, 1);
Expand All @@ -380,7 +386,8 @@ pairwise_next(pairwiseobject *po)
}

Py_XSETREF(po->old, new);
Py_DECREF(old);
Py_DECREF(old); // instead of the decref here we could borrow the reference above
Py_DECREF(it);
return result;
}

Expand Down
Loading
0