8000 Fix patchcheck for `asyncio.tasks` by kumaraditya303 · Pull Request #108159 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Fix patchcheck for asyncio.tasks #108159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -935,21 +935,21 @@ def callback():
def create_eager_task_factory(custom_task_constructor):
"""Create a function suitable for use as a task factory on an event-loop.

Example usage:
Example usage:

loop.set_task_factory(
asyncio.create_eager_task_factory(my_task_constructor))
loop.set_task_factory(
asyncio.create_eager_task_factory(my_task_constructor))

Now 6F7F , tasks created will be started immediately (rather than being first
scheduled to an event loop). The constructor argument can be any callable
that returns a Task-compatible object and has a signature compatible
with `Task.__init__`; it must have the `eager_start` keyword argument.
Now, tasks created will be started immediately (rather than being first
scheduled to an event loop). The constructor argument can be any callable
that returns a Task-compatible object and has a signature compatible
with `Task.__init__`; it must have the `eager_start` keyword argument.

Most applications will use `Task` for `custom_task_constructor` and in
Most applications will use `Task` for `custom_task_constructor` and in
this case there's no need to call `create_eager_task_factory()`
directly. Instead the global `eager_task_factory` instance can be
used. E.g. `loop.set_task_factory(asyncio.eager_task_factory)`.
"""
"""

def factory(loop, coro, *, name=None, context=None):
return custom_task_constructor(
Expand Down
0