8000 gh-89013: Improve the performance of methodcaller (lazy version) by eendebakpt · Pull Request #107201 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

gh-89013: Improve the performance of methodcaller (lazy version) #107201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
bpo-44850: Speedup methodcaller via vectorcall.
  • Loading branch information
anntzer committed Aug 22, 2021
commit 12a80bd2670f83bb7549ef8954a9881248d8ca55
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Calls to ``operator.methodcaller`` are now 25-33% faster thanks to the use of
the vectorcall protocol.
59 changes: 57 additions & 2 deletions Modules/_operator.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#include "Python.h"
#include "pycore_moduleobject.h" // _PyModule_GetState()
#include "structmember.h"
#include "clinic/_operator.c.h"

typedef struct {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1478,14 +1479,33 @@ typedef struct {
PyObject *name;
PyObject *args;
PyObject *kwds;
PyObject **vectorcall_args; /* Borrowed references */
PyObject *vectorcall_kwnames;
vectorcallfunc vectorcall;
} methodcallerobject;

static PyObject *
methodcaller_vectorcall(
methodcallerobject *mc, PyObject *const *args, size_t nargsf, PyObject* kwnames)
{
if (!_PyArg_CheckPositional("methodcaller", PyVectorcall_NARGS(nargsf), 1, 1)
|| !_PyArg_NoKwnames("methodcaller", kwnames)) {
return NULL;
}
mc->vectorcall_args[0] = args[0];
return PyObject_VectorcallMethod(
mc->name, mc->vectorcall_args,
(1 + PyTuple_GET_SIZE(mc->args)) | PY_VECTORCALL_ARGUMENTS_OFFSET,
mc->vectorcall_kwnames);
}

/* AC 3.5: variable number of arguments, not currently support by AC */
static PyObject *
methodcaller_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
methodcallerobject *mc;
PyObject *name;
PyObject *name, *key, *value;
Py_ssize_t nargs, i, ppos;

if (PyTuple_GET_SIZE(args) < 1) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "methodcaller needs at least "
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1521,6 +1541,32 @@ methodcaller_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
return NULL;
}

nargs = PyTuple_GET_SIZE(args) - 1;
mc->vectorcall_args = PyMem_Calloc(
1 + nargs + (kwds ? PyDict_Size(kwds) : 0),
sizeof(PyObject *));
if (!mc->vectorcall_args) {
return PyErr_NoMemory();
}
/* The first item of vectorcall_args will be filled with obj. */
memcpy(mc->vectorcall_args + 1, PySequence_Fast_ITEMS(mc->args),
nargs * sizeof(PyObject *));
if (kwds) {
mc->vectorcall_kwnames = PySequence_Tuple(kwds);
if (!mc->vectorcall_kwnames) {
return NULL;
}
i = ppos = 0;
while (PyDict_Next(kwds, &ppos, &key, &value)) {
mc->vectorcall_args[1 + nargs + i] = value;
++i;
}
}
else {
mc->vectorcall_kwnames = NULL;
}
mc->vectorcall = (vectorcallfunc)methodcaller_vectorcall;

PyObject_GC_Track(mc);
return (PyObject *)mc;
}
Expand All @@ -1531,6 +1577,7 @@ methodcaller_clear(methodcallerobject *mc)
Py_CLEAR(mc->name);
Py_CLEAR(mc->args);
Py_CLEAR(mc->kwds);
Py_CLEAR(mc->vectorcall_kwnames);
return 0;
}

Expand All @@ -1540,6 +1587,7 @@ methodcaller_dealloc(methodcallerobject *mc)
PyTypeObject *tp = Py_TYPE(mc);
PyObject_GC_UnTrack(mc);
(void)methodcaller_clear(mc);
PyMem_Free(mc->vectorcall_args);
tp->tp_free(mc);
Py_DECREF(tp);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1696,6 +1744,12 @@ static PyMethodDef methodcaller_methods[] = {
reduce_doc},
{NULL}
};

static PyMemberDef methodcaller_members[] = {
{"__vectorcalloffset__", T_PYSSIZET, offsetof(methodcallerobject, vectorcall), READONLY},
{NULL}
};

PyDoc_STRVAR(methodcaller_doc,
"methodcaller(name, ...) --> methodcaller object\n\
\n\
Expand All @@ -1711,6 +1765,7 @@ static PyType_Slot methodcaller_type_slots[] = {
{Py_tp_traverse, methodcaller_traverse},
{Py_tp_clear, methodcaller_clear},
{Py_tp_methods, methodcaller_methods},
{Py_tp_members, methodcaller_members},
{Py_tp_new, methodcaller_new},
{Py_tp_getattro, PyObject_GenericGetAttr},
{Py_tp_repr, methodcaller_repr},
Expand All @@ -1722,7 +1777,7 @@ static PyType_Spec methodcaller_type_spec = {
.basicsize = sizeof(methodcallerobject),
.itemsize = 0,
.flags = (Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT | Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC |
Py_TPFLAGS_IMMUTABLETYPE),
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VECTORCALL | Py_TPFLAGS_IMMUTABLETYPE),
.slots = methodcaller_type_slots,
};

Expand Down
0