-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
GH-103699: Add __orig_bases__
to various typing classes
#103698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7a81c98
Add `__orig_bases__` to non-generic TypedDict
adriangb 270cadf
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] 29b643d
Use double backticks
adriangb 4037df1
remove whitespace
AlexWaygood 19569f9
add more test cases
adriangb b777373
one more test
adriangb 4c9ee8c
Make call-based NamedTuples behave like call-based TypedDicts
adriangb 7224ddd
Add (failing) tests
adriangb 631d428
More tests
adriangb 58701ac
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-04-22-22-37-39.gh-issue-103699.N…
adriangb 3fe75eb
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-04-22-22-37-39.gh-issue-103699.N…
adriangb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-04-22-22-37-39.gh-issue-103699.NizCjc.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Add ``__orig_bases__`` to non-generic TypedDicts | ||
4745
adriangb marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add some more tests? Suggestions: a TypedDict with no bases, one with multiple bases, a generic TypedDict.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
__orig_bases__
on generic TypedDicts are already tested quite extensively, e.g.cpython/Lib/test/test_typing.py
Line 7017 in 4037df1
Tests for TypedDicts with no bases and multiple bases sound worth adding, though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added quite a few :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should I remove the checks on generic TypedDicts then? Or move them all here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's probably fine as is, actually. A little bit of duplication in tests isn't a massive issue, and it makes sense to both:
1). Test
__orig_bases__
in the test method for testing generic TypedDicts2). Test generic TypedDicts in the test method for testing
__orig_bases__