8000
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
f59751d
383c1fc
c5db6bc
683d8f7
a271ebc
977e639
bd19d79
658ea17
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have these:
#define MAX_REAL_OPCODE 254 #define IS_WITHIN_OPCODE_RANGE(opcode) \ (((opcode) >= 0 && (opcode) <= MAX_REAL_OPCODE) || \ IS_PSEUDO_OPCODE(opcode))
Sorry, something went wrong.
Okay, I'll use opcode <= MAX_REAL_OPCODE. I feel we don't need IS_PSEUDO_OPCODE() because the switch will take care of that.
opcode <= MAX_REAL_OPCODE
IS_PSEUDO_OPCODE()