8000 gh-101261: add test for function with > 255 args by iritkatriel · Pull Request #101262 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

gh-101261: add test for function with > 255 args #101262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2023
Merged

gh-101261: add test for function with > 255 args #101262

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

iritkatriel
Copy link
Member
@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented Jan 23, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2023
Closed
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the tests Tests in the Lib/test dir label Jan 23, 2023
carljm
carljm approved these changes Jan 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@carljm carljm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess in #94445 I should have added a runtime test, not just a compiler test.

@iritkatriel iritkatriel merged commit bd79039 into python:main Jan 23, 2023
@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member Author

I guess in #94445 I should have added a runtime test, not just a compiler test.

Ah yes, very similar test. Thanks.

@iritkatriel iritkatriel deleted the test_many_args branch April 3, 2023 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@carljm carljm carljm approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add test for function with > 255 args
3 participants
@iritkatriel @carljm @bedevere-bot
0