-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32k
Increase coverage of test_pyrepl #119357
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
eugenetriguba
added a commit
to eugenetriguba/cpython
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2024
You can use a single issue for increasing coverage of all of PyREPL and linking multiple PRs to that. |
eugenetriguba
added a commit
to eugenetriguba/cpython
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2024
ambv
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2024
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
lysnikolaou
pushed a commit
to lysnikolaou/cpython
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2024
…ythonGH-119358) (cherry picked from commit 73ab83b) Co-authored-by: Eugene Triguba <eugenetriguba@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
ambv
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2024
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
…#119358) Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
Triage: closing because the PR has been merged, please re-open if still needed. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When running the PyREPL tests, it gives back a code coverage percentage of about ~60% on the new
_pyrepl
module.It'd be great to increase this as we work to squash bugs in this area
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: