-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32k
socket.IP{,V6}_RECVERR not exposed #118986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Half of this got overtaken by the (more recent, but who is counting) #120056 by @sobolevn that introduced the IPv4 version but not the IPv6 version. I have updated the news message to only claim what is now being added, but did not unify the NEWS fragment because those fragments are linked to PRs by their file names. It'd make sense to have a single entry in the change log – how should that be done? Pinging @Eclips4 and @jeremyhylton as reviewers (Jeremy, thanks for insisting on alphabetical order, this made rebasing trivial). |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
The IPV6_RECVERR socket option, which is needed to make good use of the MSG_ERRQUEUE recvmsg flag, is not exposed through socket, just through the private
IN
module.Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
People who want to use this only find some stackoverflow post that points them to the internal
IN
module, which thus makes its way into production code rather than just exposing two more socket option names.Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: