-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
Tricky phrasing in the collections.Counter
docs
#109812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
docs
Documentation in the Doc dir
Comments
JacobCoffee
added a commit
to JacobCoffee/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 25, 2023
collections.Counter
odcscollections.Counter
docs
JacobCoffee
added a commit
to JacobCoffee/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 25, 2023
JacobCoffee
added a commit
to JacobCoffee/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2023
JacobCoffee
added a commit
to JacobCoffee/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2023
- fail at squashing 7 commits for one line change Signed-off-by: Jacob Coffee <jacob@z7x.org>
rhettinger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
csm10495
pushed a commit
to csm10495/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
Glyphack
pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Documentation
The collections.Counter documentation states:
c.items() # convert to a list of (elem, cnt) pairs
which seems to have been correct in Python 2 but is no longer "technically" correct
Linked PRs
collections.Counter
#109813The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: