8000 Add new test for util.py by nsiregar · Pull Request #56 · python/blurb_it · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Add new test for util.py #56

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2020

Conversation

nsiregar
Copy link
Contributor
@nsiregar nsiregar commented Jul 20, 2019

Add new test for util.py #14

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #56 into master will increase coverage by 20.59%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #56       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   61.22%   81.81%   +20.59%     
===========================================
  Files           3        3               
  Lines          49       66       +17     
  Branches        3        3               
===========================================
+ Hits           30       54       +24     
+ Misses         19       11        -8     
- Partials        0        1        +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tests/test_util.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
blurb_it/util.py 68.42% <0%> (+18.42%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5719914...587ae7d. Read the comment docs.

@nsiregar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, I've updated readme.rst.

@Mariatta Mariatta merged commit 1db538d into python:master Mar 30, 2020
@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Sorry for such delay!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0