8000 deprecation warning for case_insensitive on BaseSettings config by samuelcolvin · Pull Request #885 · pydantic/pydantic · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Member
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin commented Oct 10, 2019

This is just adding a deprecation warning and use the value of case_insensitive which was removed on #721.

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI and coverage remains at 100%
  • changes/<pull request or issue id>-<github username>.md file added describing change
    (see changes/README.md for details)

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #885 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #885   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          16     16           
  Lines        2716   2716           
  Branches      518    518           
=====================================
  Hits         2716   2716

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 41d79de...90df598. Read the comment docs.

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin changed the title deprecate case_insensitive on BaseSettings config deprecation warning for case_insensitive on BaseSettings config Oct 10, 2019
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin merged commit d381fe8 into master Oct 11, 2019
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin deleted the deprecate-case_insensitive branch October 11, 2019 14:59
andreshndz pushed a commit to cuenca-mx/pydantic that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2020
alexdrydew pushed a commit to alexdrydew/pydantic that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0