8000 Fix alias_generator and field config conflict by Bobronium · Pull Request #658 · pydantic/pydantic · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@Bobronium
Copy link
Contributor
@Bobronium Bobronium commented Jul 13, 2019

Change Summary

alias_generator will work if field has extra values in schema, but no 'alias' specified

Related issue number

#645

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI and coverage remains at 100%
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • HISTORY.rst has been updated
    • if this is the first change since a release, please add a new section
    • include the issue number or this pull request number #<number>
    • include your github username @<whomever>

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #658 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #658   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          15     15           
  Lines        2712   2712           
  Branches      537    537           
=====================================
  Hits         2712   2712

@Bobronium
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gmetzker, check this out please :)

Copy link
Member
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just rebase and update HISTORY I'm afraid (sorry, will move to towncrier or similar soon).

@gmetzker
Copy link

@gmetzker, check this out please :)

I tried your branch and it indeed fixed the issue. Thx @MrMrRobat

@Bobronium
Copy link
Contributor Author

@samuelcolvin, I gues we ready for merge!

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin merged commit 1b4c1a8 into pydantic:master Jul 24, 2019
alexdrydew pushed a commit to alexdrydew/pydantic that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0